SMA Research Platform

Evidence graph for Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Biology-first target discovery
Christian Fischer / Bryzant Labs
15,945Targets
453Trials
85Drugs
7Datasets
8,004Sources
221,721Claims
232,882Evidence
73,172Hypotheses
computationApr 27, 2026· SMA Research Platform

Three computational structure-prediction backends running in parallel: NIM, Dell, DGX Spark GB10

#compute#benchmarks#gpu#spark#dell#nim#infrastructure#phase-2

Three structure-prediction backends now running in parallel

The platform operates three independent GPU compute backends, each running structure-prediction and protein-design workloads continuously. All figures below are measured on our own runs, not vendor specifications.

Active backends (2026-04-27)

Backend Hardware Workload Status
NIM API (cloud) NVIDIA hosted Boltz-2 + ESMFold + MolMIM 162 calls/5 min, 86% OK
Dell Demo Center RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell 96 GB Boltz-2 PPI prediction 4,200+ pair predictions, 82% GPU utilization
NVIDIA DGX Spark GB10 Grace Blackwell 128 GB unified, sm_121 Chai-1 ligand prediction + local LLM 21+ predictions, ~33/hour throughput

Measured hardware benchmarks

Identical workloads run on each backend produced comparable timing data, published at /infrastructure/gpu-benchmark:

Workload Spark GB10 (48 SMs) Dell RTX Pro 6000 (188 SMs)
LLM tokens/sec (Qwen 35B Q8) 49.8 t/s 186.6 t/s (3.7x faster)
Matmul BF16 8192² 99.9 TFLOPS 395.4 TFLOPS (4.0x)
Memory ceiling 122 GB unified 96 GB GDDR

Trade-off: the Dell card wins compute throughput per second; the Spark wins memory capacity for larger models that exceed 96 GB.

Methodology notes

  • Boltz-2 vs Chai-1 dual deployment: Boltz-2 hangs on Spark sm_121 with PyTorch 2.11+cu130 (Lightning Predict phase blocked); Chai-1 0.6.1 runs natively on the same hardware. Spark therefore runs Chai-1, Dell runs Boltz-2. Both are independently published methods and provide complementary scoring.
  • BindCraft dual-mode: Spark runs design + AF2-confidence filtering (Bennett 2023 methodology); Dell runs full BindCraft including PyRosetta scoring (no aarch64 PyRosetta wheel exists).
  • We use BindCraft 1.5 rather than RFdiffusion for binder design, following the higher reported design-success rates in Pacesa et al. (Nature 2025). These are computational design-success rates from the source publications, not our own experimental confirmations.

Storage architecture

The canonical research-data root was migrated to Spark /data/research-data/ (3.6 TB capacity, 215 GB currently hosted), with an automated cloud mirror and a daily migrator that pulls staged fleet results into the canonical tree.

All predictions on this platform are computational. None have been experimentally validated. Source code and raw benchmark data: /api/v2/infrastructure/gpu-roi.

Login → Command Center